179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Nub
To:
Date:
Tue, 13 Jun 2000 20:27:49 -0600 (MDT)
Subject:
[idm] youngsters on idm-l or whatever thread this came from...
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.3.96.1000613201225.12975B-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<960947394.2518.ezmlm@hyperreal.org>
Mbox:
idm.0006.gz
someone said: << I hope that in the future more kids my age will accept idm and maybe genius' like richard james, orbital, and photek will be classified as something else besides noise, clicks and beeps. >>
quoted 3 lines I like your point, but I think Orbital is probably classified under> I like your point, but I think Orbital is probably classified under > something besides clicks noise and beeps. But rdj and photek, I see > your point there.
i take mild offense to this, though maybe i'm reading the intent wrong. even though their sound is closer to mainstream than some, imho orbital has made some of the most "intelligent" electronic music out there, compositionally-speaking. god forbid somebody actually incorporate melodies and traditional song structures into their music. uhhh... yeah. so to rephrase what djslacker said, most people (like e.g. my dad) still think orbital sounds like clicks, noise and beeps. hell, my dad probably thinks britney spears sounds like noise, clicks and beeps. he's old. nub, orbital-defender np. some idm shit or somethin' - probably hrvatski --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org